Criminal law — Vehicular homicide — Control of vehicle — Evidence — Expert — Trial court abused its discretion in admitting expert testimony that did not meet requirements of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals — Expert’s opinion that defendant had applied brakes before crash was not shown to be based upon sufficient facts or data, was not shown to be product of reliable principles and methodology, and amounted to little more than subjective and unverifiable opinion — New trial required
44 Fla. L. Weekly D1974a
The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Website or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Abbey, Adams, Byelick & Mueller, L.L.P. and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.