Insurance — Wind and hail — Where policy issued to condominium complex was for named perils of wind and hail, insured had burden of showing that damage to roofs of condominium buildings was caused by the named peril of wind — Trial court erred by granting directed verdict for insured without allowing insurer to present evidence of non-wind related causes of damage — Insurer was not required to plead the existing damage exclusion as an affirmative defense
45 Fla. L. Weekly D597a
The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Website or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Abbey, Adams, Byelick & Mueller, L.L.P. and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.