Torts — Civil procedure — Pleadings — Amendments — Trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff’s motion to amend complaint because amendments would have been futile where new negligence claims suffer same notice defects as prior claims, and plaintiff has no viable First Amendment claim because she was speaking as a government employee
44 Fla. L. Weekly D237a
The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Website or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Abbey, Adams, Byelick & Mueller, L.L.P. and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.