Abbey Adams Logo

Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982

  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

  • Bloglovin
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • Home
  • Locations
    • Where We Practice in Florida
    • Where We Practice In Illinois
  • Practices
  • Attorneys
    • David J. Abbey
    • Jeffrey M. Adams
    • Bruce D. Burk
    • Robert P. Byelick
    • Jaime Eagan
    • Jennifer J. Kennedy
    • John D. Kiernan (1947-2016)
    • V. Joseph Mueller
    • Steven A. Ochsner
    • Alexis C. Upton
  • Blog
  • Links
  • Contact Us

Archives for June 2018

June 8, 2018 by Jennifer Kennedy

Civil rights — Employment discrimination — Appeal from grant of summary judgment against complaint of employment discrimination on basis of race and national origin and of retaliatory termination —

27 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C927a Civil rights — Employment discrimination — Appeal from grant of summary judgment against complaint of employment discrimination on basis of race and national origin and of retaliatory termination — Summary judgment — Seventh Amendment does not bar a district court from granting summary judgment against a claim of employment Read More »

Filed Under: Uncategorized

June 8, 2018 by Jennifer Kennedy

Wrongful death — Maritime law — Death on the High Seas Act does not apply to a death that occurred more than three nautical miles from coast of Florida, but still within Florida’s territorial waters — Trial court erred in dismissing wrongful death action upon determining that action could only be brought under Death on the High Seas Act in federal court where there was factual issue as to whether death occurred in Florida’s territorial waters — Florida state courts have concurrent jurisdiction over Death on the High Seas Act claims

43 Fla. L. Weekly D1303a Wrongful death — Maritime law — Death on the High Seas Act does not apply to a death that occurred more than three nautical miles from coast of Florida, but still within Florida’s territorial waters — Trial court erred in dismissing wrongful death action upon determining that action could only Read More »

Filed Under: Uncategorized

June 8, 2018 by Jennifer Kennedy

Torts — Medical malpractice — Indemnity — Relief from judgment — Where malpractice action was filed against doctor and her employer, employer filed cross-claim for indemnification against doctor, summary judgment was entered for employer on the indemnification claim, and jury subsequently returned verdict for doctor in trial that took place three years after the indemnity judgment, it would be inequitable to enforce indemnity judgment against doctor since she has been exonerated from liability — Trial court properly vacated indemnity summary judgment

43 Fla. L. Weekly D1268a Torts — Medical malpractice — Indemnity — Relief from judgment — Where malpractice action was filed against doctor and her employer, employer filed cross-claim for indemnification against doctor, summary judgment was entered for employer on the indemnification claim, and jury subsequently returned verdict for doctor in trial that took place Read More »

Filed Under: Uncategorized

June 8, 2018 by Jennifer Kennedy

Torts — Automobile accident — Damages — Jury instructions — Trial court erred in instructing jury on aggravation of preexisting condition where both plaintiff’s expert and defendant’s expert testified that any injuries plaintiff may have sustained from accident did not cause aggravation or activation of a preexisting condition — Remand for new trial on causation and damages

43 Fla. L. Weekly D1251a Torts — Automobile accident — Damages — Jury instructions — Trial court erred in instructing jury on aggravation of preexisting condition where both plaintiff’s expert and defendant’s expert testified that any injuries plaintiff may have sustained from accident did not cause aggravation or activation of a preexisting condition — Remand Read More »

Filed Under: Uncategorized

June 8, 2018 by Jennifer Kennedy

Wrongful death — Employer-employee — Trial court properly dismissed action against deceased’s employer alleging defendant employer’s liability for death of employee who was hit by a train when she was walking home from work premises after having been served alcohol by employer — Defendant employer had no legal duty to employee while employee was going from work place — Section 768.125, Florida Statutes (2013), does not provide a cause of action against an employer that serves alcohol to an employee

43 Fla. L. Weekly D1249a Wrongful death — Employer-employee — Trial court properly dismissed action against deceased’s employer alleging defendant employer’s liability for death of employee who was hit by a train when she was walking home from work premises after having been served alcohol by employer — Defendant employer had no legal duty to Read More »

Filed Under: Uncategorized

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • Go to page 5
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Insurance — Homeowners — Attorney’s fees — Trial court erred in awarding attorney’s fees and costs in favor of insureds where filing of lawsuit was not a necessary catalyst to resolve dispute — Where insurer admitted coverage for damage to interior of home, but denied coverage for damage to roof, the dispute over cause of loss to roof was an amount of loss issue for appraisers, not a coverage issue for court — Where insurer demanded appraisal prior to filing of lawsuit by insured, and indicated that it would repair any damage awarded in appraisal, the filing of lawsuit was not a necessary catalyst to resolve dispute over roof damage
  • Insurance — Commercial liability — Exclusions — Assault and battery — Insurer had no duty to defend insured in action alleging injury arising out of assault and battery on insured’s premises where policy contained endorsement excluding coverage for injury arising out of or resulting from assault or battery
  • Insurance — Homeowners — Appraisal — Assignees — No error in finding that appraisal provision of insured’s homeowner’s policy applied to insured’s assignee and granting insurer’s motion to compel appraisal — Policy did not classify appraisal as a duty of the insured — Assignee received an assignment that entitled it to receipt of payment from insurer, and concomitant with that right was its duty to comply with the conditions of the contract that afforded it payment
  • Insurance — Homeowners — Water damage — Post-loss obligations — Sworn proof of loss — Trial court erred in entering summary judgment in favor of insurer after finding that insureds had forfeited their policy coverage for failure to provide a sworn proof of loss — Policy did not eliminate duty of insured to provide sworn proof of loss where insurer opted to repair — However, because insureds complied to some extent with policy requirements, and policy required insurer to prove it was prejudiced by insureds’ failure to provide sworn proof of loss, material issues of fact remain
  • Insurance — Homeowners — Watercraft exclusion — No error in determining that watercraft exclusion in the insureds’ homeowners’ insurance policy precluded coverage for injuries sustained by a third party in a boating accident that occurred when the insured son, who had permission to use the boat from the insured father, allowed another third party to pilot the boat while intoxicated — The only applicable exception to the watercraft exclusion unambiguously states that the watercraft exclusion does not apply if the outboard engine or motor is not owned by an insured, and the boat and engine in this case were owned by the insured father — Severability clause, which provides that the policy “applies separately to each insured,” did not render watercraft exclusion ambiguous — Exceptions to the watercraft exclusion are not dependent on the insured who seeks coverage, but on the nature of the watercraft at issue

Blog Archives

Footer

The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Website or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Abbey, Adams, Byelick & Mueller, L.L.P. and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney. opens in a new windowAbbey, Adams, Byelick, & Mueller XML Sitemap Index

Copyright © 2021 · Abbey Adams Byelick & Mueller, LLP · All Rights Reserved · Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982