Abbey Adams Logo

Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982

  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

  • Bloglovin
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • Home
  • Locations
    • Where We Practice in Florida
    • Where We Practice In Illinois
  • Practices
  • Attorneys
    • David J. Abbey
    • Jeffrey M. Adams
    • Bruce D. Burk
    • Robert P. Byelick
    • Jaime Eagan
    • Jennifer J. Kennedy
    • John D. Kiernan (1947-2016)
    • V. Joseph Mueller
    • Steven A. Ochsner
    • Alexis C. Upton
  • Blog
  • Links
  • Contact Us

Archives for January 2020

January 2, 2020 by Jennifer Kennedy

Torts — Negligence — Sovereign immunity — Law enforcement officer — Action against school resource officer at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School alleging that deputy’s negligence contributed to decedent’s death — Trial court did not err in denying deputy’s motion to dismiss, finding that deputy was not entitled to statutory immunity under section 768.28(9) as a matter of law — Complaint sufficiently pled allegations, which if true, would permit a reasonable trier of fact to find that deputy acted “in bad faith” or “with malicious purpose” or “with wanton and willful disregard of human rights or safety” as those phrases are used in statute — Discussion of how courts have interpreted and defined phrases used in statute — With regards to “wanton and willful disregard” standard, a reasonable trier of fact could find that deputy’s failure to confront school shooter, and failure to take any other action to fulfill his duty of protecting students and teachers, while choosing to remain outside in a protected location to ensure his own safety, constituted a conscious and intentional indifference to consequences with the knowledge that damage is likely to be done to persons, which deputy committed intentionally, knowingly and purposefully — Court can foresee how a reasonable trier of fact could find that deputy’s alleged conduct met “bad faith” and “malicious purpose” standards where complaint alleged that deputy’s lockdown order prevented students and teachers from escaping while ensuring deputy’s safety, and that deputy misinformed responding officer that deputy did not know shooter’s location, instead telling responding officer to watch deputy’s back — Definitions of “in bad faith” and “with malicious purpose” are not synonymous with “wanton and willful disregard”; thus special interrogatory verdicts for each phrase may be advisable at trial to avoid application of two-issue rule — Discussion of federal cases related to Columbine High School shooting in which law enforcement officers’ immunity-based motions to dismiss were granted — Present case is distinguishable from Columbine cases where complaint in present case alleged that deputy’s choice to remain outside ran counter to deputy’s training regarding how to address an active-shooter situation, and that deputy had no valid reason for remaining outside the building other than for his own protection

44 Fla. L. Weekly D2983b Torts — Negligence — Sovereign immunity — Law enforcement officer — Action against school resource officer at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School alleging that deputy’s negligence contributed to decedent’s death — Trial court did not err in denying deputy’s motion to dismiss, finding that deputy was not entitled to statutory Read More »

Filed Under: Uncategorized

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4

Primary Sidebar

Blog Archives

  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013

Footer

The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Website or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Abbey, Adams, Byelick & Mueller, L.L.P. and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney. opens in a new windowAbbey, Adams, Byelick, & Mueller XML Sitemap Index

Copyright © 2021 · Abbey Adams Byelick & Mueller, LLP · All Rights Reserved · Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982