Abbey Adams Logo

Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982

  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

  • Bloglovin
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • Home
  • Locations
    • Where We Practice in Florida
    • Where We Practice In Illinois
  • Practices
  • Attorneys
    • David J. Abbey
    • Jeffrey M. Adams
    • Bruce D. Burk
    • Robert P. Byelick
    • Jaime Eagan
    • Jennifer J. Kennedy
    • John D. Kiernan (1947-2016)
    • V. Joseph Mueller
    • Steven A. Ochsner
    • Alexis C. Upton
  • Blog
  • Links
  • Contact Us

December 9, 2016 by admin

Appeals — Order denying Citizens Property Insurance Corporation’s motion to dismiss and/or strike two counts of complaint and abating those counts until coverage or extent of liability are determined is non-final, non-appealable order

41
Fla. L. Weekly D2660a
Top of Form

Appeals
— Non-final orders — Order denying Citizens Property Insurance Corporation’s
motion to dismiss and/or strike two counts of complaint and abating those
counts until coverage or extent of liability are determined is non-final,
non-appealable order — Record does not support contention that trial court’s
order was one determining as matter of law that sovereign immunity was not
available — Appeal dismissed

CITIZENS
PROPERTY INSURANCE CORP., Appellant, vs. RAFAELA SOSA, Appellee. 3rd District.
Case No. 3D15-2901. L.T. Case No. 15-16231. Opinion filed November 30, 2016. An
Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County,
Migna Sanchez-Llorens, Judge. Counsel: Methe & Rockenbach and Kara Berard
Rockenbach, Lauren J. Smith, and Kristi Bergemann Rothell (West Palm Beach),
for appellant. Perry & Neblett and David Avellar Neblett and John A. Wynn,
for appellee.

(Before
SUAREZ, C.J., and LAGOA and SALTER, JJ.)

ON
MOTION TO DISMISS

(LAGOA,
J.) Appellee, Rafaela Sosa (“Sosa”), moves to dismiss the appeal of a non-final
order denying Citizens Property Insurance Corporation’s (“Citizens”) motion to
strike certain bad faith allegations and dismiss and/or strike Count II and
Count III of Sosa’s complaint. The trial court’s order abates Count II and
Count III of Sosa’s complaint until coverage or extent of liability are
determined. Because the order appealed is a non-final, non-appealable order, we
grant the motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

The
order on appeal denies Citizens’ motion to dismiss and abates consideration of
Counts II and III of Sosa’s complaint until a determination of coverage is
made. It is well-established that “[a]n order abating or staying an action
pending disposition of another action is not a reviewable non-final order.” Pecora
v. Signature Gardens, Ltd.
, 25 So. 3d 599, 599 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). See
also
Hedin v. Indian River Cty., 610 So. 2d 715 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

Citizens
nonetheless argues that the order is appealable pursuant to Florida Rule of
Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(xi), which provides for appeal of non-final
orders that determine “that, as a matter of law, a party is not entitled to
sovereign immunity.” Citizens’ assertion, characterizing the trial court’s
order as one determining that it is not entitled to sovereign immunity as a
matter of law, however, is not supported by the record. Significantly, the
order on appeal does not state that the motion to dismiss is denied on the
basis that Citizens lacks sovereign immunity. Instead, the order merely states
that Counts II and III of Sosa’s complaint are abated “until coverage or extent
of liability are determined.” Furthermore, a review of the transcript of the
hearing on the motion to dismiss also shows that the trial court did not reach
or rule on the issue of sovereign immunity. Cf. Amcon Builders, Inc.
v. Pardo
, 120 So. 3d 1254, 1255 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (finding order denying
summary judgment on a claim of workers’ compensation immunity not appealable “
‘unless the trial court order specifically states that, as a matter of law,
such a defense is not available to a party’ ” (quoting Reeves v. Fleetwood
Homes of Fla., Inc.
, 889 So. 2d 812, 821-22 (Fla. 2004))). Here, the trial
court’s order fails to state that, as a matter of law, sovereign immunity is
not available to Citizens. As such, the trial court’s order is not appealable
pursuant to Rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(xi).

Because
the order denying Citizens’ motion to dismiss is not reviewable under Florida
Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130 as a non-final order, we grant Sosa’s motion
to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Dismissed.

* *
*

Filed Under: Articles

Primary Sidebar

Blog Archives

  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013

Footer

The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Website or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Abbey, Adams, Byelick & Mueller, L.L.P. and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney. opens in a new windowAbbey, Adams, Byelick, & Mueller XML Sitemap Index

Copyright © 2021 · Abbey Adams Byelick & Mueller, LLP · All Rights Reserved · Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982