49 Fla. L. Weekly D610a TEKI WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. JOHN WEAVER, Appellee. 5th District. Case No. 5D23-0324. L.T. Case No. 2019-CA-000171. March 15, 2024. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County. Eric C. Roberson, Judge. Counsel: Brian J. Lee, of Morgan & Morgan, Jacksonville, for Appellant. Kansas R. Gooden, Miami, and Lara Edelstein, […]
Articles
Insurance — Automobile liability — Bad faith — Action for common law and statutory bad faith filed by insured and personal injury plaintiff alleging that bad faith had occurred when insurer failed to settle personal injury action by declining proposal for settlement which authorized insureds to enter into a consent judgment in excess of the policy limits that would not be recorded or enforced against the insureds, but which made no indication that insurer would be released from any bad faith liability — No error determining that insurer’s refusal to accept proposals for settlement could not form basis of bad faith claim — Discussion of federal court decision in Kropilak v. 21st Century Insurance Co. — An insurer has no duty to enter a consent judgment in excess of the limits of its policy, and does not ordinarily have a duty to pay a claim in excess of a policy’s limit — Trial court erred by entering final judgment in favor of insurer to extent plaintiff’s claims raised other theories of bad faith, such as how insurer handled personal injury plaintiff’s claims against the insured
49 Fla. L. Weekly D458a BENJAMIN D. MARKUSON; ERIK SATERBO; and STEPHEN SATERBO, Appellants, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation; CRAWFORD LAW GROUP, P.A., a Florida corporation; and LARRY WALKER, Appellees. 2nd District. Case No. 2D21-2443. February 28, 2024. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Emily A. Peacock, Judge. […]
Insurance — Underinsured motorist — Coverage — Limitation of actions — Tolling of period — Trial court erred by granting summary judgment in favor of insurer based on determination that insured’s claim for underinsured motorist benefits was time-barred because it was filed more than five years after date of collision — Statute of limitations was effectively tolled by policy where policy included an exhaustion provision conditioning insurer’s payment of UM benefits on payment of all bodily injury liability benefits by underinsured motorist’s insurer and a no-action provision conditioning suit against insurer on compliance with all policy terms — Although insured could have filed suit against insurer without waiting for payment from tortfeasor’s liability carrier under accrual rule for UM benefits, she was not required to do so based on language of her policy
49 Fla. L. Weekly D504d ROSEMARY ARWAY, Appellant, v. PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. 6th District. Case No. 6D23-399. L.T. Case No. 21-CA-000533. March 1, 2024. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County. Keith R. Kyle, Judge. Counsel: Alexander L. Brockmeyer, Thomas E. Shepard, and Gregory L. Evans, of Boyle, Leonard & Anderson, P.A., […]
Torts — Premises liability — Argument — New trial — No error in granting motion for new trial based on statement defense counsel made during closing argument which was false, highly prejudicial and inflammatory, violative of prior court order, and not curable — Referral to Florida Bar
49 Fla. L. Weekly D498a NEIGHBORHOOD RESTAURANT PARTNERS FLORIDA, LLC, Appellant, v. KIRK B. WOLFF, as PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE of the ESTATE of PETER WOLFF, Appellee. 5th District. Case No. 5D22-1029. L.T. Case No. 05-2020-CA-012922. March 1, 2024. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County. George Paulk, Judge. Counsel: G. Jeffrey Vernis and Isam […]
Torts — Premises liability — Supermarkets — Slip and fall — Transitory substance — Knowledge of dangerous condition — Summary judgment — No error in granting summary judgment in favor of defendant based on determination that there was no genuine dispute of material fact regarding whether defendant had constructive notice of clear liquid on the floor which caused plaintiff to slip and fall — Surveillance video showing multiple customers standing, walking, and pushing carts through exact spot where liquid was found in the nine minutes between when defendant’s employee left the area and the incident, combined with the deposition testimony of that employee, did not support a permissible inference that condition existed for a sufficient length of time to establish that defendant had constructive notice — Although a jury could choose to disbelieve employee’s unequivocal testimony that he would have noticed liquid if it was on the floor, that is not enough to survive summary judgment
49 Fla. L. Weekly D436b SANDRA LEFTWICH, Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and THOMAS SCHOENDORF, Appellees. 5th District. Case No. 5D22-2821. L.T. Case No. 2020-CA-0370. February 22, 2024. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County. Donald Scaglione, Judge. Counsel: Brian J. Lee, of Morgan & Morgan, Jacksonville, for Appellant. Andrew S. Bolin […]