Abbey Adams Logo

Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982

  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

  • Bloglovin
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • Home
  • Locations
    • Where We Practice in Florida
    • Where We Practice In Illinois
  • Practices
  • Attorneys
    • David J. Abbey
    • Jeffrey M. Adams
    • Bruce D. Burk
    • Robert P. Byelick
    • Jaime Eagan
    • Jennifer J. Kennedy
    • John D. Kiernan (1947-2016)
    • V. Joseph Mueller
    • Steven A. Ochsner
    • Alexis C. Upton
  • Blog
  • Links
  • Contact Us

October 3, 2014 by admin

Attorneys’ Fees and Costs under 57.105 discretionary; Costs under 57.041 not discretionary

39 Fla. L. Weekly D2054b


Attorney’s fees — Claim or defense not supported by material facts or
applicable law — Trial court did not abuse discretion by denying defendant’s
motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes, where
claim was not entirely devoid of merit — Costs — It was error to deny award of
costs to prevailing party

STEVEN FRISCHER, Appellant, vs. MARGARITA QUINTANA, JOSE QUINTANA, AND
ANNETTE QUINTANA, Appellees. 3rd District. Case No. 3D14-824. L.T. Case No.
11-2748. Opinion filed September 24, 2014. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for
Miami-Dade County, Abby Cynamon, Judge. Counsel: Nancy C. Wear, B.C.S., and
Nancy C. Wear, for appellant. Richard F. Watson, P.A., and Richard F. Watson,
for appellees.
(Before ROTHENBERG, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.)
(LOGUE, Judge.) Steven Frischer appeals from a final order of the trial court
denying his motion for attorney’s fees and prejudgment interest as a sanction
under section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2011), and denying him costs as the
prevailing party under section 57.041, Florida Statutes (2011).
We affirm the denial of attorney’s fees under section 57.105. A trial court’s
denial of a motion for attorney’s fees under section 57.105 is reviewed for
abuse of discretion. Puglisi v. Puglisi, 135 So. 3d 1146, 1147 (Fla. 5th
DCA 2014); Lago v. Kame By Design, LLC, 120 So. 3d 73, 74 (Fla. 4th DCA
2013). Admittedly, this lawsuit was filed almost fifteen years after the
applicable statute of limitations had run. The argument, however, that the cause
of action did not accrue until recently, although feeble, was not so entirely
devoid of merit that the trial court’s decision to decline to award fees rose to
the level of an abuse of discretion.
The trial court, however, erred in failing to award costs. Section 57.041
provides:

(1) The party recovering judgment shall recover all of his or her
legal costs and charges which shall be included in the judgment; but this
section does not apply to executors or administrators in actions when they are
not liable for costs.

(2) Costs may be collected by execution on the judgment or order
assessing costs.

A trial court has no discretion whether to award costs pursuant to this
section. Higgs v. Klock, 873 So. 2d 591, 592 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (“[U]nder
the statute, every party who recovers a judgment in a legal proceeding is
entitled as a matter of right to recover lawful court costs, and a trial judge
has no discretion to deny costs to the parties recovering judgment.”) (internal
quotation and citation omitted); Wilkerson v. Johnson, 139 So. 3d 965,
967 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (“Courts have interpreted this statute as removing from
the trial court the discretion to deny costs to the prevailing party in a civil
action.”). Frischer specifically requested costs as the prevailing party
pursuant to section 57.041. Because Frischer was the prevailing party, he was
entitled to an award of costs.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded for proceedings consistent
with this opinion.

* * *

Filed Under: Articles

Primary Sidebar

Blog Archives

  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013

Footer

The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Website or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Abbey, Adams, Byelick & Mueller, L.L.P. and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney. opens in a new windowAbbey, Adams, Byelick, & Mueller XML Sitemap Index

Copyright © 2021 · Abbey Adams Byelick & Mueller, LLP · All Rights Reserved · Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982