Attorney’s fees — Civil procedure — Discovery — Motions — Defendant ordered to pay attorney’s fees under rule 1.380(a)(4) based on conclusion that plaintiff had prevailed on its motion to compel discovery — Award under rule 1.380(a)(4) was made in error because rule 1.380(a)(4) is not a prevailing party rule and written order made no finding regarding whether defendant’s opposition to the motion was substantially justified
44 Fla. L. Weekly D506a
The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Website or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Abbey, Adams, Byelick & Mueller, L.L.P. and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.
opens in a new windowAbbey, Adams, Byelick, & Mueller XML Sitemap Index