Abbey Adams Logo

Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982

  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

  • Bloglovin
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • Home
  • Locations
    • Where We Practice in Florida
    • Where We Practice In Illinois
  • Practices
  • Attorneys
    • David J. Abbey
    • Jeffrey M. Adams
    • Robert P. Byelick
    • Jennifer J. Kennedy
    • John D. Kiernan (1947-2016)
    • V. Joseph Mueller
  • Blog
  • Links
  • Contact Us

Uncategorized

January 28, 2021 by Jennifer Kennedy

Wrongful death — Evidence — Hearsay — Where decedent was killed when a tractor-trailer backed over him, and there were issues as to whether driver honked his horn before backing up, and if he did, why decedent did not hear the horn and move to a safe position, it was error to admit the deposition of a police detective who testified that another officer told him that decedent had an earbud in his ear when lying on the ground after the accident — Testimony constituted inadmissible hearsay — Error was not harmless

46 Fla. L. Weekly D233b GAIL JOHNSON DAYES, etc., Appellant, v. WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., Appellees. 3rd District. Case No. 3D19-1920. L.T. Case No. 17-18241. January 27, 2021. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Antonio Arzola, Judge. Counsel: Falk, Waas, Hernandez & Solomon, P.A., and Glenn P. Falk; Russo Appellate Firm, Read More »

Filed Under: Uncategorized

January 28, 2021 by Jennifer Kennedy

Torts — Automobile accident — Discovery — Non-parties — Financial information — Amount of money paid by defendants’ counsel and counsel’s law firm to retained trial experts over past three years — Certiorari relief from discovery order denied — Question certified whether the analysis and decision in Worley v. Cent. Fla. Young Men’s Christian Ass’n. should also apply to preclude a defense law firm that is not a party to the litigation from having to disclose its financial relationship with experts that it retains for purposes of litigation including those that perform compulsory medical examinations under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.360?

46 Fla. L. Weekly D225a GLENDA E. KENT AND SCOTT GEORGE WALSH, Petitioners, v. LEIDY A. DIAZ-NAVEDO, Respondent. 5th District. Case No. 5D20-1759. January 22, 2021. Petition for Certiorari Review of Order from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Chad K. Alvaro, Judge. Counsel: Kansas R. Gooden, of Boyd & Jenerette, P.A., Boca Raton, for Read More »

Filed Under: Uncategorized

January 28, 2021 by Jennifer Kennedy

Torts — Negligence — New trial — Trial court erred in granting a new trial without finding that jury’s verdict was against the manifest weight of the evidence as to causation — Remand for reinstatement of jury’s verdict where trial court had previously been given opportunity by appellate court to make the necessary finding but did not do so

46 Fla. L. Weekly D194a FRED MEYERS and NINIBETH MEYERS, Appellants, v. BONNEVA SHONTZ, Appellee. 2nd District. Case No. 2D19-1294. Opinion filed January 20, 2021. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Pamela A.M. Campbell, Judge. Counsel: Elizabeth C. Wheeler of Elizabeth C. Wheeler, P.A., Orlando, for Appellants. Robert W. Hitchens of Hitchens & Read More »

Filed Under: Uncategorized

January 21, 2021 by Jennifer Kennedy

Insurance — Homeowners — Water damage — Post-loss obligations — Sworn proof of loss — Insurer did not waive affirmative defense of failure of insured to comply with post-loss obligations by issuing payment to insured — In order for there to be total forfeiture of coverage under homeowner’s insurance policy for failure to comply with post-loss obligations, insured’s breach must be material — If material breach is established, burden shifts to insured to show that any breach did not prejudice insurer — Final judgment in favor of insured reversed — Remand for parties to present their cases under framework established in American Integrity Ins. Co. v. Estrada

46 Fla. L. Weekly D201b UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INS. CO., Appellant, v. MONIKA HORNE, Appellee. 3rd District. Case No. 3D19-1550. L.T. Case No. 17-5020. January 20, 2021. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, John W. Thornton, Jr., Judge. Counsel: Russo Appellate Firm P.A., and Paulo R. Lima, and Elizabeth K. Russo, Read More »

Filed Under: Uncategorized

January 21, 2021 by Jennifer Kennedy

Attorney’s fees — Justiciable issues — Safe harbor notice — Service — E-mail — Trial court erred by striking defendant’s section 57.105 motion because defendant’s safe harbor notice did not strictly comply with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516’s e-mail service requirements — Rule 2.516’s e-mail service requirements do not apply to service of a section 57.105 safe harbor notice

46 Fla. L. Weekly D209b SAFEPOINT INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. ELENA GINSBURG and MICHAEL GINSBURG, Appellees. 4th District. Case No. 4D18-2158. January 20, 2021. Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Martin J. Bidwill, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 17-12167 (05). Counsel: Carol M. Rooney of Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig Read More »

Filed Under: Uncategorized

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 49
  • Go to page 50
  • Go to page 51
  • Go to page 52
  • Go to page 53
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 60
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Insurance — Homeowners — Windstorm loss — Notice of loss — Timeliness — Prejudice to insurer — No error in entering summary judgment in favor of insurer based on determination that insured failed to overcome presumption that insurer was prejudiced by his failure to timely report claim for hurricane damage — Insured failed to act with reasonable dispatch and within a reasonable time where insured waited two years and seven months to report claim of hurricane damage to his roof — Conclusory affidavits submitted by insured in opposition to summary judgment were insufficient to rebut presumption of prejudice where passage of time rendered insurer unable to determine what current damage was directly attributable to the storm — Court rejects argument that policy was ambiguous because it contained a clause imposing a blanket bar on any hurricane-related claim beyond three-year window and a second clause requiring insured to provide prompt notice of any claim — Clauses, when read together, require an insured to file any hurricane-related claim within three years of the storm, and to act swiftly upon discovering damages
  • Insurance — Uninsured motorist — Bad faith — Complaint — Amendment — Addition of claim for punitive damages — Action alleging that insurer violated law by issuing policies without a written rejection form and by accepting verbal rejections of UM coverage — Error to grant insured’s motion for leave to add punitive damages claim where insured failed to provide reasonable basis to find that insurer’s acts occurred with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice, and were willful, wanton, and malicious and in reckless disregard for insured’s rights
  • Consumer law — Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices — Proposal for settlement — Attorney’s fees — Costs — Prevailing party — Where partial summary judgment as to liability was granted in favor of plaintiff, but jury awarded no damages, it was not an abuse of discretion for trial court to deny defendant’s request for attorney’s fees as a prevailing party on Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act claim — No error in denying fees and costs under proposals for settlement presented to trial court — None of the proposals proffered satisfied strict requirements of section 768.79 and rule 1.442 where proposals required plaintiff to execute a release but failed to describe release with sufficient detail, contained ambiguity as to punitive damages, and required payment from date of settlement without defining such date — Error to deny request for costs under section 57.041 — A zero judgment constitutes a judgment in favor of the defendant for purposes of recovery of costs under the statute
  • Torts — Premises liability — Slip and fall — Discovery — Relevance — Appeals — Certiorari — Order requiring defendant’s corporate representative to address areas of inquiry related to defendant’s corporate-wide operations is quashed — Allowing corporate-wide discovery amounted to carte blanche discovery that results in irreparable harm and departs from essential requirements of the law — Information is not discoverable based on its relevance to show negligent mode of operation because, under section 768.0755, negligent mode of operation is not a viable theory of recovery in slip-and-fall cases
  • Insurance — Uninsured motorist — Bad faith — Complaint — Amendment — Addition of claim for punitive damages — Action alleging that insurer violated law by issuing policies without a written rejection form and by accepting verbal rejections of UM coverage — Error to grant insured’s motion for leave to add punitive damages claim where insured failed to provide reasonable basis to find that insurer’s acts occurred with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice, and were willful, wanton, and malicious and in reckless disregard for insured’s rights

Blog Archives

Footer

The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Website or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Abbey, Adams, Byelick & Mueller, L.L.P. and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney. opens in a new windowAbbey, Adams, Byelick, & Mueller XML Sitemap Index

Copyright © 2023 · Abbey Adams Byelick & Mueller, LLP · All Rights Reserved · Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982