Child custody — Timesharing — Modification — Evidence supported trial court’s finding that there had been substantial, material, and unanticipated change in circumstances and that modification of timesharing was in best interests of child — Order modifying timesharing was not rendered insufficient for failing to provide mother with specific steps to regain timesharing — Section 61.13(3) neither authorizes nor requires trial court to set forth the specific steps necessary to reestablish timesharing — Conflict certified
45 Fla. L. Weekly D516a
The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Website or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Abbey, Adams, Byelick & Mueller, L.L.P. and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.
opens in a new windowAbbey, Adams, Byelick, & Mueller XML Sitemap Index