Abbey Adams Logo

Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982

  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

  • Bloglovin
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • Home
  • Locations
    • Where We Practice in Florida
    • Where We Practice In Illinois
  • Practices
  • Attorneys
    • David J. Abbey
    • Jeffrey M. Adams
    • Bruce D. Burk
    • Robert P. Byelick
    • Jaime Eagan
    • Jennifer J. Kennedy
    • John D. Kiernan (1947-2016)
    • V. Joseph Mueller
    • Steven A. Ochsner
    • Alexis C. Upton
  • Blog
  • Links
  • Contact Us

September 25, 2014 by admin

Circuit Court Appellate Decision — Error to preclude insurance carrier from deposing medical provider regarding reasonableness of charges — Scope of discovery

21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 992a

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2110OLIV


Insurance — Discovery — Depositions — Error to prohibit insurer from
deposing medical provider regarding reasonableness of charges

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. CORAL GABLES
CHIROPRACTIC, PLLC, a/a/o Ricardo Olivera, Respondent. Circuit Court, 11th
Judicial Circuit (Appellate) in and for Miami-Dade County. Case No. 13-297 AP.
May 20, 2014. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the County Court for
Miami-Dade County, Florida, Judge Gloria Gonzalez-Meyer. Counsel: Lara J.
Edelstein, for Petitioner. George A. David, for Respondent.

(Before GENDEN, FIRTEL, and FREEMAN, JJ.)

(PER CURIAM.) Petitioner, United Automobile Insurance Company, filed a
petition for writ of certiorari seeking review of the trial court’s order
denying its motion to compel and prohibiting the Petitioner from deposing the
Respondent, Coral Gables Chiropractic, PLLC. We grant the petition because the
trial court failed to allow discovery as to the reasonableness of the fees
charged by the Respondent for services rendered to the insured, Ricardo Olivera.
As to the necessity and relatedness of said charges, we find that Petitioner has
waived these arguments. We further find that the statement made by the lower
court that “discovery as to anything else other than your affirmative defense is
not permitted under the law” is incorrect. See Smith v. Bloom, 506 So. 2d
1173 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987 (“The rule is any information sought which is either
relevant to the subject matter of the litigation or ‘appears reasonably
calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence,’ if not privileged,
is subject to discovery.”) (Citing Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.280(b)(1).)

Petition for Writ of Certiorari is GRANTED, and the matter is REMANDED with
instructions to allow discovery as to the reasonableness of the charges.
Respondent’s motion for attorney’s fees is DENIED.

* * *

Filed Under: Articles

Primary Sidebar

Blog Archives

  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013

Footer

The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Website or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Abbey, Adams, Byelick & Mueller, L.L.P. and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney. opens in a new windowAbbey, Adams, Byelick, & Mueller XML Sitemap Index

Copyright © 2021 · Abbey Adams Byelick & Mueller, LLP · All Rights Reserved · Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982