Civil procedure — Dismissal — Failure to prosecute — Notarized affidavit attesting that plaintiff did not receive notice of lack of prosecution is not sufficient to establish that trial court abused its discretion in denying motion to vacate order of dismissal

ALAN FEUER, Appellant, v. KRASSIMIR IVANOV and ROBERT MILLER, Appellees. 3rd District. Case No. 3D18-0453. L.T. Case No. 14-24299. February 13, 2019. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Abby Cynamon, Judge. Counsel: Alan Feuer, in proper person. Robert Miller, for appellees.

(Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES, and LINDSEY, JJ.)

(PER CURIAM.) Alan Feuer appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion to vacate an order of dismissal entered after Feuer failed to appear for a hearing on the court’s Notice of Lack of Prosecution and Order to Appear for Hearing (the “Notice”). Feuer contends the notarized affidavit he submitted attesting to him having not received the Notice is sufficient grounds to establish that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion to vacate. We disagree. Feuer failed to allege any of the grounds set forth in Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e). Accordingly, upon consideration of the record on appeal, as well as the initial brief, we summarily affirm the order on appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a).

Affirmed.