Counties — Ordinances — For-hire transportation services — Challenge to constitutionality of ordinance authorizing transportation network entities such as Uber and Lyft to operate in for-hire transportation market brought by plaintiffs who possessed a “medallion,” or license, to provide those services — Plaintiffs’ claims for declaratory and injunctive relief were mooted when Florida legislature passed new body of laws that preempted the TNE ordinance — District court did not err in dismissing plaintiffs’ claims for monetary damages arising under Takings and Equal Protection Clauses, which were not moot
27 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C1113a
The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Website or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Abbey, Adams, Byelick & Mueller, L.L.P. and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.
opens in a new windowAbbey, Adams, Byelick, & Mueller XML Sitemap Index