Dissolution of marriage — Child custody — Jurisdiction — Trial court correctly determined that it had jurisdiction to make an initial custody determination under section 61.514 based on its findings that Florida was the children’s “home state” when husband initiated custody proceedings and that children’s absence from state was temporary — However, upon learning of temporary child custody order in Massachusetts, trial court erred in finding it unnecessary to contact the Massachusetts court to determine whether Massachusetts would be a more appropriate forum to resolve the custody issues as required by Section 61.517(4) — Remand for trial court to communicate with Massachusetts court in accordance with statute
44 Fla. L. Weekly D2310f
The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Website or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Abbey, Adams, Byelick & Mueller, L.L.P. and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.
opens in a new windowAbbey, Adams, Byelick, & Mueller XML Sitemap Index