Abbey Adams Logo

Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982

  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

  • Bloglovin
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • Home
  • Locations
    • Where We Practice in Florida
    • Where We Practice In Illinois
  • Practices
  • Attorneys
    • David J. Abbey
    • Jeffrey M. Adams
    • Bruce D. Burk
    • Robert P. Byelick
    • Jaime Eagan
    • Jennifer J. Kennedy
    • John D. Kiernan (1947-2016)
    • V. Joseph Mueller
    • Steven A. Ochsner
    • Alexis C. Upton
  • Blog
  • Links
  • Contact Us

August 12, 2016 by admin

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Medical expenses — Reasonableness of charges — Trial court did not err in entering summary judgment in favor of medical provider on issue of reasonableness of MRI charge where opposing affidavit failed to include amounts other providers charge and accept as full payment for MRI services and failed to provide facts establishing that affiant is qualified to render opinion on reasonableness of MRI charges

24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 106b

Online Reference: FLWSUPP 2402AYER

Insurance — Personal injury protection — Coverage — Medical expenses — Reasonableness of charges — Trial court did not err in entering summary judgment in favor of medical provider on issue of reasonableness of MRI charge where opposing affidavit failed to include amounts other providers charge and accept as full payment for MRI services and failed to provide facts establishing that affiant is qualified to render opinion on reasonableness of MRI charges

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. HALLANDALE OPEN MRI, LLC A/A/O RICHARD AYER, Appellees. Circuit Court, 17th Judicial Circuit (Appellate) in and for Broward County. Case No. CACE 14-011565 (AP). L.T. Case No. CONO 13-02964. November 6, 2015. Appeal from the County Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County. Steven P. DeLuca, Judge. Counsel: David C. Borucke, of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. Dean A. Mitchell, of Dean A. Mitchell Law, Ocala, for Appellee.

OPINION

 
(PER CURIAM.) State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company appeals the final judgment in favor of Hallandale Open MRI, LLC. Having carefully reviewed the briefs, the record, and the applicable law, this Court dispenses with oral argument and finds that the final judgment in favor of Appellee should be AFFIRMED as set forth below. 

 Provider presented sufficient evidence to establish the reasonableness of the charge before the trial court. In contrast, the Darrel Spell Affidavit fails to include any range of what other MRI providers charge for the same service during the time in question. The affidavit does not contain the amounts that other providers accepted as full payment for the charge involved. The affidavit fails to contain a factual basis to establish that Mr. Spell is qualified to give opinions on the MRI service charges. Mr. Spell’s affidavit has been rejected by a previous panel of this Court as well as the Fourth District Court of Appeal. See State Farm v. Fla. Wellness & Rehab., 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 88a (Broward Cir. App. Div. 2015); See also State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Pembroke Pines MRI, Inc., 171 So. 3d 814, 817 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). Accordingly, the final judgment in favor of the plaintiff is hereby AFFIRMED. 

Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400(a) and section 627.428, Florida Statutes, the Appellee is entitled to appellate attorney’s fees, and its motion for same is hereby GRANTED in an amount to be determined by the trial court upon REMAND. Appellants Motion for Attorney Fees is hereby DENIED. (ENGLANDER HENNING, TUTER and MURPHY, JJ., concur.)

* * *

Filed Under: Articles

Primary Sidebar

Blog Archives

  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013

Footer

The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Website or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Abbey, Adams, Byelick & Mueller, L.L.P. and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney. opens in a new windowAbbey, Adams, Byelick, & Mueller XML Sitemap Index

Copyright © 2021 · Abbey Adams Byelick & Mueller, LLP · All Rights Reserved · Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982