Abbey Adams Logo

Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982

  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

  • Bloglovin
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • Home
  • Locations
    • Where We Practice in Florida
    • Where We Practice In Illinois
  • Practices
  • Attorneys
    • David J. Abbey
    • Jeffrey M. Adams
    • Bruce D. Burk
    • Robert P. Byelick
    • Jaime Eagan
    • Jennifer J. Kennedy
    • John D. Kiernan (1947-2016)
    • V. Joseph Mueller
    • Steven A. Ochsner
    • Alexis C. Upton
  • Blog
  • Links
  • Contact Us

August 29, 2014 by admin

Property Insurance — Trial court erred in requiring carrier to pay for subsurface repairs before insured entered into contract for such repairs in contravention of policy language tracking 627.707, Fla. Stat.

39 Fla. L. Weekly D1756a


Insurance — Homeowners — Property damage — Sinkhole — Subsurface repairs
— Error to order insurer to pay for subsurface repairs before homeowner entered
into contract for these repairs where insurance policy contained loss settlement
provision which authorized withholding of payment until homeowners entered into
contract for repairs
TOWER HILL SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. ANDREW MCKEE, Appellee.
2nd District. Case No. 2D13-2076. Opinion filed August 20, 2014. Appeal from the
Circuit Court for Polk County; Mark H. Hofstad, Judge. Counsel: Carol M. Rooney
and Ezequiel Lugo of Butler Pappas Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP, Tampa, for
Appellant. Robert E. Biasotti and Annette Marie Lang of Biasotti and Associates,
St. Petersburg, for Appellee.
(SLEET, Judge.) Tower Hill Select Insurance Company appeals the final summary
judgment awarding $181,317.26, including interest in the amount of $22,429.08,
in favor of Andrew McKee for sinkhole damages to his property. We review the
trial court’s ruling on a motion for summary judgment and interpretation of an
insurance contract and statutes de novo. See Volusia Cnty. v. Aberdeen
at Ormond Beach, L.P.
, 760 So. 2d 126, 130 (Fla. 2000); State Farm Fla.
Ins. Co. v. Phillips
, 134 So. 3d 505, 507 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014).
This appeal involves a coverage dispute between McKee and Tower Hill
concerning sinkhole damage to McKee’s home. In March 2010, McKee timely filed a
claim for property damage to his home related to a sinkhole. In July 2010, Tower
Hill’s designated engineer concluded there was no evidence of a sinkhole and
Tower Hill denied coverage. In early 2011, McKee hired a private engineer who
concluded that the damage was caused by a sinkhole. McKee provided the report to
Tower Hill. Tower Hill did not respond, and McKee filed an action for breach of
contract.
Many of Tower Hill’s issues on appeal depend on its underlying assertion that
McKee preemptively filed suit because no cause of action existed at the time he
filed his complaint. This argument is without merit. When Tower Hill denied
coverage a valid dispute as to the existence of a covered loss under the
insurance policy arose. See, e.g. Warfel v. Universal Ins. Co. of N.
Am.
, 36 So. 3d 136 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (considering a dispute as to whether a
covered loss had occurred under the insured’s policy), approved, 82 So.
3d 47 (Fla. 2012). Accordingly, McKee’s complaint properly sought a
determination as to whether Tower Hill breached the insurance contract by
denying coverage of a covered loss. See id. The policy provisions
containing conditions precedent to suit that Tower Hill relies on in its
appellate briefs were only relevant to a situation where Tower Hill admitted
liability and a dispute as to the amount of recovery arose. Accordingly, they
could not act to bar McKee from filing suit when Tower Hill denied his insurance
claim entirely.
However, we agree that it was error for the trial court to order Tower Hill
to pay for subsurface repairs before McKee entered into a contract for those
repairs. Because the insurance policy contained a loss settlement provision
tracking the language of section 627.707(5)(b), Florida Statutes (2010), Tower
Hill had the authority to withhold payment for subsurface repairs until McKee
entered into a contract for those repairs. See Phillips, 134 So.
3d at 508.
McKee’s failure to enter into a contract for subsurface repairs was a factor
outside Tower Hill’s control that reasonably prevented payment. Section
627.70131(5)(a), Florida Statutes (2013), authorizes an award of prejudgment
interest on “[a]ny payment of an initial or supplemental claim or portion of
such claim made 90 days after the insurer receives notice of the claim, or made
more than 15 days after there are no longer factors beyond the control of the
insurer which reasonably prevented such payment,
whichever is later.”
(Emphasis added). Therefore, the trial court’s award of prejudgment interest on
the subsurface damage award was premature.
Accordingly, we reverse the portions of the final judgment requiring Tower
Hill to pay for subsurface repairs before McKee contracted for those repairs and
awarding prejudgment interest as to the subsurface damage award. We affirm the
remaining portions of the final judgment without further comment.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. (KELLY and KHOUZAM, JJ.,
Concur.)

* * *

Filed Under: Articles

Primary Sidebar

Blog Archives

  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013

Footer

The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Website or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Abbey, Adams, Byelick & Mueller, L.L.P. and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney. opens in a new windowAbbey, Adams, Byelick, & Mueller XML Sitemap Index

Copyright © 2021 · Abbey Adams Byelick & Mueller, LLP · All Rights Reserved · Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982