Abbey Adams Logo

Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982

  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

  • Bloglovin
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • Home
  • Locations
    • Where We Practice in Florida
    • Where We Practice In Illinois
  • Practices
  • Attorneys
    • David J. Abbey
    • Jeffrey M. Adams
    • Bruce D. Burk
    • Robert P. Byelick
    • Jaime Eagan
    • Jennifer J. Kennedy
    • John D. Kiernan (1947-2016)
    • V. Joseph Mueller
    • Steven A. Ochsner
    • Alexis C. Upton
  • Blog
  • Links
  • Contact Us

March 27, 2014 by admin

Second DCA reverses trial court order denying Citizens’ “request” for stay pending neutral evaluation

39 Fla. L. Weekly D577a


Insurance — Homeowners — Sinkhole damage — Trial court
improperly denied stay of breach of contract action pending completion of
neutral evaluation process

CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, a Florida government entity,
Petitioner, v. REBECCA HANOS, Respondent. 2nd District. Case No. 2D13-3872.
Opinion filed March 19, 2014. Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit
Court for Pasco County; Stanley R. Mills, Judge. Counsel: Kara Berard Rockenbach
of Methe & Rockenbach, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Aram P. Megerian of Cole,
Scott & Kissane, P.A., Tampa, for Petitioner. George Vaka and Nancy A.
Lauten of Vaka Law Group, Tampa, for Respondent.
(DAVIS, Chief Judge.) Citizens Property Insurance Corporation seeks
certiorari review of the trial court’s order denying its request for an
automatic stay pursuant to section 627.7074(10), Florida Statutes, in the breach
of contract action brought against Citizens by Rebecca Hanos.
That underlying action stems from a dispute between the parties over repairs
made to Hanos’ home after sinkhole damage was discovered. Prior to trial,
Citizens invoked the neutral evaluation process outlined in section 627.7074 and
filed a notice of automatic stay pursuant to subsection (10) of the statute. The
trial court then entered an order denying Citizens’ “request” for a stay.
To the extent that order prohibits Citizens from invoking the neutral
evaluation process, we grant the petition and quash the order. See
Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Trapeo, 2D13-2078, 2014 WL 340670 (Fla. 2d
DCA Jan. 31, 2014) [39 Fla. L. Weekly D245a]; Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v.
Finley
, 2D13-3445, 2014 WL 340668 (Fla. 2d DCA Jan. 31, 2014) [39 Fla. L.
Weekly D248a]. Furthermore, we treat the remaining portion of Citizens’ petition
before this court — the portion that challenges the trial court’s refusal to
enter the automatic stay — as a petition for writ of mandamus and grant the
petition. The trial court is directed to stay the underlying proceedings pending
the completion of the neutral evaluation as required by section 627.7074(10).
Certiorari petition granted; order quashed; mandamus petition granted with
directions. (NORTHCUTT and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.)

* * *

Filed Under: Articles

Primary Sidebar

Blog Archives

  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013

Footer

The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Website or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Abbey, Adams, Byelick & Mueller, L.L.P. and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney. opens in a new windowAbbey, Adams, Byelick, & Mueller XML Sitemap Index

Copyright © 2021 · Abbey Adams Byelick & Mueller, LLP · All Rights Reserved · Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982