Torts — Civil theft — Default — Plaintiff’s civil theft claim was invalid — Defendant insurance adjuster did not obtain or use the property of plaintiff by depositing check naming defendant as a co-payee with plaintiff where agreement between parties provided that plaintiff agreed to assign its funds to defendant — Further, plaintiff’s demand letters to defendant were deficient because they requested more than the allowable amount of treble damages — Agreement which was submitted by plaintiff with complaint negated civil theft allegations — Trial court abused discretion in granting unliquidated treble damages on erroneously alleged civil theft claim
43 Fla. L. Weekly D2575a
The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Website or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Abbey, Adams, Byelick & Mueller, L.L.P. and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.