Abbey Adams Logo

Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982

  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

  • Bloglovin
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • Home
  • Locations
    • Where We Practice in Florida
    • Where We Practice In Illinois
  • Practices
  • Attorneys
    • David J. Abbey
    • Jeffrey M. Adams
    • Bruce D. Burk
    • Robert P. Byelick
    • Jaime Eagan
    • Jennifer J. Kennedy
    • John D. Kiernan (1947-2016)
    • V. Joseph Mueller
    • Steven A. Ochsner
    • Alexis C. Upton
  • Blog
  • Links
  • Contact Us

June 10, 2016 by admin

Torts — Defamation — Action against Florida Bar alleging Bar defamed plaintiff when it posted in his attorney profile and stated in a letter that plaintiff had been “disbarred” when supreme court had “revoked” plaintiff’s license

41 Fla. L. Weekly D1373aTop of Form

Torts
— Defamation — Action against Florida Bar alleging Bar defamed plaintiff when
it posted in his attorney profile and stated in a letter that plaintiff had
been “disbarred” when supreme court had “revoked” plaintiff’s license for
making material omissions in application for admission to Bar — Revocation can
be tantamount to disbarment — Moreover, Bar has absolute immunity for actions
taken within scope of its authority as arm of Florida Supreme Court in matters
of regulation of attorneys

DANIEL MARK ZAVADIL, Appellant, v. THE FLORIDA BAR,
Appellee. 4th District. Case No. 4D15-3573. June 8, 2016. Appeal from the
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Carol-Lisa
Phillips, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE15-005275 (25). Counsel: Daniel Zavadil,
Sterling, Virginia, pro se. M. Hope Keating and Michael H. Moody of Greenberg
Traurig, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellee.

ON
MOTION FOR REHEARING

(PER CURIAM.) We deny the motion for rehearing en banc but
grant the motion for a written opinion, withdraw our prior affirmance without
opinion, and substitute the following opinion in its place.

Affirmed. The trial court correctly
dismissed appellant’s complaint against The Florida Bar for defamation. In his
complaint, appellant alleged that the Bar defamed him when it posted in his
attorney profile and stated in a letter that he had been “disbarred” when the
supreme court had “revoked” his license for making material omissions in his
application for admission to the Bar. See Fla. Bd. of Bar Exam’rs re Zavadil,
123 So. 3d 550 (Fla. 2013). A revocation of a license can be tantamount to a
disbarment. See R. Regulating Fla. Bar 3-5.1(g) (“A disciplinary
revocation is tantamount to a disbarment.”).1 Moreover, the Bar has absolute
immunity for actions taken within the scope of its authority as an arm of the
Florida Supreme Court in the matters of the regulation of attorneys. See
Mueller v. The Fla. Bar
, 390 So. 2d 449, 451 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). The term
“scope of office” has been interpreted broadly. Id. at 451-52.
Maintaining an accurate public listing of attorneys, including whether or not
they are in good standing and able to practice, is an integral part of the
Bar’s duties, as is responding to inquiries regarding an attorney’s status. See,
e.g., R. Regulating Fla. Bar 3-5.4. (WARNER, CONNER and FORST, JJ.,
concur.)

__________________

1Although appellant’s suspension was
under Florida Bar Admissions Rule 5-14, Rule 3-5.1(g) is instructive that
revocation and disbarment are similar. To “disbar” means to expel from the bar
so that the member can no longer practice law in that jurisdiction. See R.
Regulating Fla. Bar 3-5.1(f); Black’s Law Dictionary (10th ed. 2014).
Revocation of the license also prevents the member from practicing law in that
jurisdiction.

* *
*

Filed Under: Articles

Primary Sidebar

Blog Archives

  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013

Footer

The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Website or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Abbey, Adams, Byelick & Mueller, L.L.P. and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney. opens in a new windowAbbey, Adams, Byelick, & Mueller XML Sitemap Index

Copyright © 2021 · Abbey Adams Byelick & Mueller, LLP · All Rights Reserved · Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982