Torts — Medical malpractice — Indemnity — Relief from judgment — Where malpractice action was filed against doctor and her employer, employer filed cross-claim for indemnification against doctor, summary judgment was entered for employer on the indemnification claim, and jury subsequently returned verdict for doctor in trial that took place three years after the indemnity judgment, it would be inequitable to enforce indemnity judgment against doctor since she has been exonerated from liability — Trial court properly vacated indemnity summary judgment
43 Fla. L. Weekly D1268a
The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Website or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Abbey, Adams, Byelick & Mueller, L.L.P. and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.
opens in a new windowAbbey, Adams, Byelick, & Mueller XML Sitemap Index