Torts — Negligence — Security services — In action by plaintiff who was attacked and injured in parking garage owned by county at a time when no security guard was present against company which had contracted with county to provide security services at parking garage, trial court properly entered summary judgment for defendant security company on basis that under provisions of contract between security company and county, county retained control over shift schedule and number of guards assigned to garage — Defendant did not assume county’s duty to protect plaintiff where county had determined that garage was only to be staffed by a security guard from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. and plaintiff was attacked after 7 p.m. in the evening
45 Fla. L. Weekly D8a
The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Website or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Abbey, Adams, Byelick & Mueller, L.L.P. and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.
opens in a new windowAbbey, Adams, Byelick, & Mueller XML Sitemap Index