Abbey Adams Logo

Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982

  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

  • Bloglovin
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • Home
  • Locations
    • Where We Practice in Florida
    • Where We Practice In Illinois
  • Practices
  • Attorneys
    • David J. Abbey
    • Jeffrey M. Adams
    • Bruce D. Burk
    • Robert P. Byelick
    • Jaime Eagan
    • Jennifer J. Kennedy
    • John D. Kiernan (1947-2016)
    • V. Joseph Mueller
    • Steven A. Ochsner
    • Alexis C. Upton
  • Blog
  • Links
  • Contact Us

March 17, 2017 by admin

Torts — Workers’ compensation immunity — Special employer — No error in entering summary judgment in favor of help supply services company contractor based on finding that contractor was acting as plaintiff’s special employer where record conclusively showed that plaintiff was employee of help supply services company

42
Fla. L. Weekly D625b
Top of Form

Torts
— Workers’ compensation immunity — Special employer — No error in entering
summary judgment in favor of help supply services company contractor based on
finding that contractor was acting as plaintiff’s special employer where record
conclusively showed that plaintiff was employee of help supply services company
— With respect to claims of intentional conduct and negligent hiring, among
others, brought against help supply services company based upon conduct of
worker who was operating conveyor belt at time plaintiff was injured, evidence
showed that worker operating conveyor belt was not employed by help supply
services company — Evidence — No abuse of discretion in refusing to consider
worker’s partially completed deposition as evidence where the deposition was
taken prior to help supply services company becoming party to suit and no party
with the same interest was present at the deposition

ANDRES
MORERA, Appellant, v. WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. OF FLORIDA, a Florida corporation,
TWIN LAKES LAND RECLAMATION, INC., a Florida corporation, WASTE COLLECTION,
INC., a Florida corporation, and GL STAFFING SERVICES, INC., a Florida
corporation, Appellees. 4th District. Case No. 4D14-3135. March 15, 2017.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward
County; Mily Rodriguez Powell, Judge; L.T. Case No. 12-013045 CACE (03).
Counsel: Roy D. Wasson of Wasson & Associates, Chartered, Frank L. Labrador
and Mary Margaret Schneider of Demahy, Labrador, Drake, Victor & Cabeza,
and Jose Manuel Francisco, Miami, for appellant. Steven H. Osber and Emily A.
Thomas of Kelley, Kronenberg, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees Waste Management
Inc. of Florida and GL Staffing Services, Inc.

(WARNER,
J.) We affirm the final summary judgment in favor of defendants/appellees Waste
Management Inc. of Florida and GL Staffing Services, Inc., in a suit for
personal injuries. The trial court found that Waste Management had immunity
from appellant’s claims under Florida’s Worker’s Compensation Act because it
was acting as appellant’s “special employer.” We conclude that final summary
judgment was properly entered because the record conclusively shows that Waste
Management was immune from liability pursuant to section 440.11(2), Florida
Statutes (2010), as appellant was an employee of Waste Collections, a help
supply services company, as defined in Standard Industry Code Industry Number
7363 of the U.S. Department of Labor Standard Classifications.1 Although appellant argues on appeal
that he should be considered as employed by a facilities support management
service, defined in a separate standard, he did not make this argument to the
trial court. Therefore, it is not preserved. See Pensacola Beach Pier, Inc.
v. King
, 66 So. 3d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

As
to GL Staffing Services, appellant had filed suit against it for intentional
conduct and negligent hiring, among other claims, based upon the conduct of
worker Juarez, who was operating the conveyor belt at the time appellant was
injured and whom appellant claimed was employed by GL. If GL did not employ
Juarez, then it had no liability to appellant. On summary judgment, the
evidence presented, including wage receipts and other documents, showed that
Juarez was employed by Waste Collections, thus making him a co-employee of appellant.
There was no evidence presented that GL employed appellant and was thus in any
way liable. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to
consider Juarez’s partially completed deposition, during which, appellant
claimed, Juarez had testified he was a GL employee, not a Waste Collection
employee. The deposition was cut short because of Juarez’s transportation
problems, and the parties were unable to locate him to complete the deposition.
The deposition was taken prior to GL becoming a party to the suit, and no party
with the same interest as GL was present. To use a deposition on the authority
of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.330(a), the party against whom it is
offered must have been “present or represented at the taking of the deposition
or who had reasonable notice of it[.]” Moreover, as we read the excluded
deposition, Juarez did not say that he was employed by GL, but merely that GL
sent him to the job site. The conclusive evidence of wage receipts and other
documents show that Juarez was employed by Waste Collection, the help services
contractor, and not GL. Therefore, the trial court did not err in granting
summary judgment.

Affirmed.
(GERBER
and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.)

__________________

1Standard
Industry Code Industry Number 7363 is incorporated through section 440.11(2),
Florida Statutes, which provides:

The immunity from liability
described in subsection (1) shall extend to an employer and to each employee of
the employer which utilizes the services of the employees of a help supply
services company, as set forth in Standard Industry Code Industry Number 7363,
when such employees, whether management or staff, are acting in furtherance of
the employer’s business. An employee so engaged by the employer shall be
considered a borrowed employee of the employer, and, for the purposes of this
section, shall be treated as any other employee of the employer.

§
440.11(2), Fla. Stat.

* *
*

Filed Under: Articles

Primary Sidebar

Blog Archives

  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013

Footer

The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Website or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Abbey, Adams, Byelick & Mueller, L.L.P. and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney. opens in a new windowAbbey, Adams, Byelick, & Mueller XML Sitemap Index

Copyright © 2021 · Abbey Adams Byelick & Mueller, LLP · All Rights Reserved · Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982