Abbey Adams Logo

Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982

  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

  • Bloglovin
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • Home
  • Locations
    • Where We Practice in Florida
    • Where We Practice In Illinois
  • Practices
  • Attorneys
    • David J. Abbey
    • Jeffrey M. Adams
    • Bruce D. Burk
    • Robert P. Byelick
    • Jaime Eagan
    • Jennifer J. Kennedy
    • John D. Kiernan (1947-2016)
    • V. Joseph Mueller
    • Steven A. Ochsner
    • Alexis C. Upton
  • Blog
  • Links
  • Contact Us

December 22, 2017 by admin

Workers’ compensation — Attorney’s fees — Trial court lacks jurisdiction to review portion of order entered by judge of compensation claims following remand from appellate court finding claimant entitled to attorney’s fees for defeating fraud defense asserted by e/c where JCC reserved jurisdiction to determine amount of fees

43
Fla. L. Weekly D26aTop of Form

Workers’
compensation — Attorney’s fees — Trial court lacks jurisdiction to review
portion of order entered by judge of compensation claims following remand from
appellate court finding claimant entitled to attorney’s fees for defeating
fraud defense asserted by e/c where JCC reserved jurisdiction to determine
amount of fees

LEVY COUNTY TRANSIT/ GALLAGHER
BASSETT SERVICES, Appellants, v. ANTOINETTE KOKENZIE, Appellee. 1st District.
Case No. 1D17-3098. Opinion filed December 21, 2017. An appeal from an order of
the Judge of Compensation Claims. Marjorie Renee Hill, Judge. Date of Accident:
March 13, 2015. Counsel: Christopher J. DuBois and Mary E. Cruickshank of
DuBois & Cruickshank, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellants. Mark N. Tipton,
Ocala, for Appellee.

(PER CURIAM.) In this workers’
compensation appeal, the employer/carrier (E/C) challenges the portion of the
order entered by the judge of compensation claims (JCC) on remand from Levy
County Transit/Gallagher Bassett Servs. v. Kokenzie
, 220 So. 3d 1251 (Fla.
1st DCA 2017) (Kokenzie I), finding the claimant entitled to attorney’s
fees for defeating the fraud defense asserted by the E/C. We dismiss the appeal
for the reasons that follow.

In Kokenzie I, we affirmed
the JCC’s rejection of the fraud defense asserted by the E/C but we reversed
the award of temporary partial disability (TPD) benefits to the claimant
because the JCC’s finding that the workplace injury was the major contributing
cause of the claimant’s injuries was not supported by competent substantial
evidence. Id. at 1252. We remanded “for entry of an order consistent with
th[e] opinion,” id. at 1253, and on remand, the JCC entered an order
rejecting the fraud defense and denying the claim for TPD benefits. The order
also granted the claimant’s claim for attorney’s fees for successfully
defeating the fraud defense, but reserved jurisdiction to determine the amount
of the fee award if the parties were unable to agree upon the amount.

On appeal, the E/C argues that JCC
erred in determining that the claimant was entitled to attorney’s fees because
the claimant failed to secure any past benefits and no future benefits will
ever be due because the claimant failed to prove that the injury was
work-related. The claimant responds that we lack jurisdiction to review the
portion of the order determining her entitlement to fees because the JCC
reserved jurisdiction on the amount of the fees.

Although the E/C may well be correct
on the merits, we agree with the claimant that we lack jurisdiction to review
the issue at this time. Indeed, this court has repeatedly held that a
determination of entitlement to attorney’s fees is not appealable where
jurisdiction is reserved to determine the amount of the fees. See, e.g.,
Stanley Steemer Int’l v. Smith , 139 So. 3d 507 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Dep’t
of
Corr. v. Ferguson, 98 So. 3d 669, 670 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012); Polk
Cty. Bd. of Cty. Comm’rs v. Lyon-Spires
, 85 So. 3d 582 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012);
Zampell Refractories, Inc. v. Welch, 61 So. 3d 1160 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011);
Dep’t of Children & Families v. Monroe, 744 So. 2d 1163, 1164 (Fla.
1st DCA 1999); Se. Recycling v. Cottongim, 728 So. 2d 342, 342-43 (Fla.
1st DCA 1999); Wometco Enters. v. Cordoves, 650 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. 1st
DCA 1995). Although the other portions of the order entered on remand are
appealable, see Commercial Carrier Corp. v. LaPointe, 723 So. 2d 912,
914 n. 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), they were not challenged by either party.
Accordingly, because this appeal only concerns the determination of entitlement
to attorney’s fees, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

DISMISSED. (WETHERELL, MAKAR, and
KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.)

* * *

Filed Under: Articles

Primary Sidebar

Blog Archives

  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013

Footer

The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Website or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Abbey, Adams, Byelick & Mueller, L.L.P. and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney. opens in a new windowAbbey, Adams, Byelick, & Mueller XML Sitemap Index

Copyright © 2021 · Abbey Adams Byelick & Mueller, LLP · All Rights Reserved · Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982