Workers’ compensation — Compensable injuries — Evidence — Expert opinion — Judge of compensation claims erred in admitting opinion of claimant’s independent medical examiner that exposure to mold in the workplace was the major contributing cause of claimant’s injury where opinion was based on improper bolstering and lacked a sufficient factual foundation — Expert opinion was improperly bolstered by professional opinions and reports of others and by inadmissible medical records of claimant’s co-worker
43 Fla. L. Weekly D2718b
The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Website or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Abbey, Adams, Byelick & Mueller, L.L.P. and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.
Abbey, Adams, Byelick, & Mueller XML Sitemap Index