Abbey Adams Logo

Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982

  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

  • Bloglovin
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • Home
  • Locations
    • Where We Practice in Florida
    • Where We Practice In Illinois
  • Practices
  • Attorneys
    • David J. Abbey
    • Jeffrey M. Adams
    • Bruce D. Burk
    • Robert P. Byelick
    • Jaime Eagan
    • Jennifer J. Kennedy
    • John D. Kiernan (1947-2016)
    • V. Joseph Mueller
    • Steven A. Ochsner
    • Alexis C. Upton
  • Blog
  • Links
  • Contact Us

November 20, 2015 by admin

Workers’ compensation — No error in awarding psychiatric treatment and temporary total disabilities based on finding that claimant suffered compensable and disabling mental injury

40
Fla. L. Weekly D2581a
Top of Form

Workers’
compensation — No error in awarding psychiatric treatment and temporary total
disabilities based on finding that claimant suffered compensable and disabling
mental injury — Evidence — Although judge of compensation claims improperly
considered medical opinions of physician who was not treating physician,
independent medical examiner, or expert medical advisor, error was harmless —
JCC reversibly erred by ordering employer/carrier to pay providers and any
third-party payers for services provided — JCC had jurisdiction only to
conclude that care was for compensable injury and medically necessary, and
therefore not claimant’s responsibility — JCC erred in concluding that
claimant’s first psychiatric hospitalization was not compensable emergency care

BOLEY CENTERS, INC./ COMP OPTIONS,
Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. WILLIAM VINES, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. 1st
District. Case No. 1D14-5869. Opinion filed November 16, 2015. An appeal from
an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Stephen L. Rosen, Judge. Date of
Accident: January 8, 2014. Counsel: Ben H. Cristal and Gian-Franco Melendez of
Cristal Hanenian, LLC, Tampa, for Appellants/Cross-Appellees. Bill McCabe,
Longwood, and John H. Thompson, IV, St. Petersburg, for
Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

(PER CURIAM.) In this workers’ compensation case, the
Employer/Carrier (E/C) raises four issues on appeal to challenge the Judge of
Compensation Claims’ (JCC’s) award of psychiatric treatment and temporary total
disability benefits. On cross-appeal, Claimant raises one issue and argues the
JCC erred by concluding the first of his two psychiatric hospitalizations was
not compensable emergency medical care. As explained below, we affirm in part,
reverse in part, and remand for entry of an order consistent with our opinion
herein.

In the first issue on appeal, the E/C correctly points out
that the JCC improperly considered the medical opinions of a physician who was
not a treating physician, independent medical examiner (IME), or expert medical
advisor. § 440.13(5)(e), Fla. Stat. (2013). See also Cespedes v.
Yellow Transp., Inc.
, 130 So. 3d 243, 250-51 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (holding
proof of compensable emergency care requires medical opinion admissible under
subsection 440.13(5)(e) which establishes emergency care was both medically
necessary for, and causally related to, compensable workplace injury).
Nevertheless, based on this court’s review of the appellate record as a whole,
such error is harmless — as we conclude there is no reasonable possibility
that this error contributed to the result in this case, nor is there a
reasonable possibility that a different result would be reached were this case
remanded for reconsideration of the issue of compensability without the benefit
of the emergency room physician’s opinions. See Special v. W. Boca
Med. Ctr.
, 160 So. 3d 1251, 1256 (Fla. 2014) (holding that the test for
harmless error requires beneficiary of error to establish there was no
reasonable possibility that the error contributed to verdict).

We find no merit to the E/C’s second point on appeal, which
argues the JCC used an improper legal standard to find Claimant’s mental injury
compensable, and affirm without further comment.

On the E/C’s third point on appeal, we agree the JCC
reversibly erred when he ordered the E/C to pay the providers and any third
party payers for all psychiatric bills incurred after April 2, 2014. The JCC
had no jurisdiction to award payment to the emergency care providers or
reimbursement to any third party payer for services. Instead, the JCC could
only conclude that the care was for a compensable injury and was medically
necessary — and therefore not Claimant’s responsibility. See Williams
v. Triple J Enters.
, 650 So. 2d 1114, 1116 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (explaining
that although JCC does not have jurisdiction over reimbursement disputes
between medical providers and carriers, JCC has jurisdiction to resolve issues
of medical necessity as between claimant and carrier).

Because we find no reversible error regarding the JCC’s
finding and conclusion that Claimant suffered a compensable and disabling
mental injury, the E/C’s fourth point on appeal, which challenges an award of
disability benefits attributable to such injury, is affirmed.

Relative to Claimant’s cross-appeal, which challenges the
JCC’s finding that Claimant’s first psychiatric hospitalization was not
compensable emergency care, we conclude that the facts that establish the
second hospitalization as emergency services, as was concluded by the JCC
(under sections 440.13(1)(f) and 395.002(10), Florida Statutes (2013)), are not
meaningfully different than the facts surrounding the first hospitalization.
Accordingly, we reverse the JCC’s conclusion that the first hospitalization was
not compensable emergency medical care.

In summary, we AFFIRM the appealed order to the extent it
finds Claimant suffered a compensable psychiatric injury, REVERSE that portion
of the order requiring the E/C to make payment to medical providers, REVERSE
the JCC’s finding that Claimant’s first hospitalization was not compensable
emergency medical care, and REMAND for entry of an order consistent with this
opinion. (WOLF, THOMAS, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.)

* *
*

Filed Under: Articles

Primary Sidebar

Blog Archives

  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013

Footer

The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Website or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Abbey, Adams, Byelick & Mueller, L.L.P. and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney. opens in a new windowAbbey, Adams, Byelick, & Mueller XML Sitemap Index

Copyright © 2021 · Abbey Adams Byelick & Mueller, LLP · All Rights Reserved · Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982