Abbey Adams Logo

Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982

  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

  • Bloglovin
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Phone
  • Home
  • Locations
    • Where We Practice in Florida
    • Where We Practice In Illinois
  • Practices
  • Attorneys
    • David J. Abbey
    • Jeffrey M. Adams
    • Bruce D. Burk
    • Robert P. Byelick
    • Jaime Eagan
    • Jennifer J. Kennedy
    • John D. Kiernan (1947-2016)
    • V. Joseph Mueller
    • Steven A. Ochsner
    • Alexis C. Upton
  • Blog
  • Links
  • Contact Us

June 16, 2017 by admin

Workers’ compensation — Temporary partial disability — Misrepresentation — Competent, substantial evidence supported judge of compensation claims’ conclusion that claimant did not make intentional misrepresentations for purpose of obtaining workers’ compensation benefits — Determination that workplace injury was major contributing cause of claimant’s disability and need for medical care was not based on competent, substantial evidence — JCC erred in awarding TPD benefits

42
Fla. L. Weekly D1354a
Top of Form

Workers’
compensation — Temporary partial disability — Misrepresentation — Competent,
substantial evidence supported judge of compensation claims’ conclusion that
claimant did not make intentional misrepresentations for purpose of obtaining
workers’ compensation benefits — Determination that workplace injury was major
contributing cause of claimant’s disability and need for medical care was not
based on competent, substantial evidence — JCC erred in awarding TPD benefits

LEVY COUNTY TRANSIT/ GALLAGHER
BASSETT SERVICES, Appellants, v. ANTOINETTE KOKENZIE, Appellee. 1st District.
Case No. 1D16-4817. June 14, 2017. An appeal from an order of Judge of
Compensation Claims. Marjorie Renee Hill, Judge. Date of Accident: March 13,
2015. Counsel: Christopher J. DuBois and Mary E. Cruickshank of DuBois &
Cruickshank, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellants. Mark N. Tipton and Daniel L.
Hightower of Daniel L. Hightower, P.A., Ocala, for Appellee.

(B.L. THOMAS, J.) In this workers’
compensation case, the Employer/Carrier challenge an order awarding Claimant
temporary partial disability benefits and rejecting the affirmative defense of
misrepresentation under paragraphs 440.09(4)(a) and 440.105(4)(b), Florida
Statutes (2014). Because the record contains competent, substantial evidence
supporting the Judge of Compensation Claims’ conclusion that Claimant did not
make intentional misrepresentations for the purpose of obtaining workers’
compensation benefits, we affirm that ruling. But we reverse and remand the
temporary partial disability award, because the determination that the
workplace injury is the major contributing cause of Claimant’s disability and
need for medical care is not based on competent, substantial evidence.

Claimant reported that she injured
her neck while transporting a wheelchair-bound passenger on March 13, 2015. The
Employer/Carrier accepted compensability of the workplace injury and authorized
medical care with Dr. Trimble, an orthopedic surgeon. Dr. Trimble ultimately opined
that the major contributing cause of Claimant’s neck complaints is preexisting
degeneration of the cervical spine, not the workplace injury. Dr. Lowell,
another orthopedic surgeon, later provided Claimant’s medical care and
recommended surgery of the cervical spine.

Claimant filed a claim for temporary
partial disability benefits in light of Dr. Lowell’s surgical recommendation.
The Employer/Carrier defended the claim, in part, on the ground that the
workplace injury is not the major contributing cause of Claimant’s neck
condition, based on Dr. Trimble’s expert opinion and the expert opinion of Dr.
Rumana, the Employer/Carrier’s independent medical examiner.

Under subsection 440.09(1), Florida
Statutes (2014), an employer/carrier is responsible for providing benefits only
where the accidental compensable injury is the major contributing cause of any
resulting injuries. Thus, Claimant bore the burden of persuasion to prove that
the compensable workplace injury is the major contributing cause for the need
for the requested benefits. See Babahmetovic v. Scan Design Fla., Inc.,
176 So. 3d 1006, 1008 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015); Checkers Restaurant v. Wiethoff,
925 So. 2d 348, 350 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). In accordance with the statute, a
major contributing cause is the cause that is more than 50% responsible for the
injury, when compared to all other causes combined for which treatment or
benefits are sought. § 440.09(1), Fla. Stat. (2014). Furthermore, major
contributing cause must be demonstrated by medical evidence only, and “[p]ain
or other subjective complaints alone, in the absence of objective relevant
medical findings, are not compensable.” Id.

According to the Judge of
Compensation Claims, Dr. Lowell opined that, “assuming Claimant’s neck has been
asymptomatic since the early 2000s,” the workplace injury is the major
contributing cause of the need for surgery and related disability. But Dr.
Lowell never actually testified that the workplace injury is the major
contributing cause of the need for cervical surgery.

Dr. Lowell testified that Claimant
specifically told him that she never had any previous symptoms or treatment of
the neck. Even with this history, Dr. Lowell initially indicated that the major
contributing cause issue here “falls in a gray zone.” Later, after reviewing
Claimant’s prior medical records, the doctor agreed that the workplace injury
is not the major contributing cause of Claimant’s current condition. When asked
by Claimant’s attorney if the workplace injury would be the major contributing
cause of the need for surgery, assuming Claimant had some prior neck complaints
but none after the early 2000s, Dr. Lowell did not directly answer the
question. Instead, he stated that he “would have to conclude the accident was
responsible for the new onset of symptoms,” if Claimant gave him
“accurate and complete” information”; however, he said, “those conclusions
[are] more difficult to render” when the information is not accurate and
complete. At no point did Dr. Lowell indicate that the information necessary to
make a causal connection would not include all of Claimant’s pertinent medical
history. This opinion, as qualified, does not match the facts regarding
Claimant’s past medical history, including her previously reported neck pain.
Thus, Claimant failed to carry her burden of persuasion, as she did not show
that the need for the surgery was linked to the workplace accident.

We therefore reverse the award of
temporary partial disability benefits associated with the recommended medical
treatment and remand for entry of an order consistent with this opinion.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part,
and REMANDED. (LEWIS and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.)

* * *

Filed Under: Articles

Primary Sidebar

Blog Archives

  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013

Footer

The materials available at this website are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Use of and access to this Website or any of the e-mail links contained within the site do not create an attorney-client relationship between Abbey, Adams, Byelick & Mueller, L.L.P. and the user or browser. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney. opens in a new windowAbbey, Adams, Byelick, & Mueller XML Sitemap Index

Copyright © 2021 · Abbey Adams Byelick & Mueller, LLP · All Rights Reserved · Defending Liability, Workers' Compensation, Employment Claims and Appeals Since 1982